So, you hard-core hardback book readers ...
Can you tell me if *all* Baen hardcovers are the same width and height? If so is this a size you see in hardbacks from Tor or Daw or .... anyone else?
Odd question, you say? Well, gee, but see, the newest thing we, as authors, have been accused of is of being responsible for the fact that Duainfey ... and I assume Longeye as well, will not fit in a custom bookcase designed to house Lee & Miller books from Meisha Merlin.
And you know, just as we can't order a publisher to publish a book only in trade paper (of a certain size), or only in mass market, or first in hardback and then in three ring binders; we don't control the form factor of the style of book a publisher goes for.
Right -- see Duainfey is (according to Amazon, who/which may know) 9 x 5.9 x 1.2 inches ... while a sample from the Meisha Merlin years, say Balance of Trade, they tell us is 8.5 x 5.6 x 1.3 inches. No, wait, the advertent reader may want to get a ruler out -- because my copy of Duainfey seems to measure 9.5 X 6.5 X ... hey wait, that's a full inch taller! Not only that, but Stars, the anthology, runs larger than Meisha Merlin books but not as tall as Duainfey ... and Amazon's ruler-crew says it is ...9.2 x 6.4 x 1.6 inches ....
And you know what? It is NOT OUR FAULT (as authors )that book sizes are not standard. But really, how many hardcover sizes are there on your shelves, anyway? Are all Baen books the same size? Does Baen use this form factor to make their books stand tall?
Can you tell me if *all* Baen hardcovers are the same width and height? If so is this a size you see in hardbacks from Tor or Daw or .... anyone else?
Odd question, you say? Well, gee, but see, the newest thing we, as authors, have been accused of is of being responsible for the fact that Duainfey ... and I assume Longeye as well, will not fit in a custom bookcase designed to house Lee & Miller books from Meisha Merlin.
And you know, just as we can't order a publisher to publish a book only in trade paper (of a certain size), or only in mass market, or first in hardback and then in three ring binders; we don't control the form factor of the style of book a publisher goes for.
Right -- see Duainfey is (according to Amazon, who/which may know) 9 x 5.9 x 1.2 inches ... while a sample from the Meisha Merlin years, say Balance of Trade, they tell us is 8.5 x 5.6 x 1.3 inches. No, wait, the advertent reader may want to get a ruler out -- because my copy of Duainfey seems to measure 9.5 X 6.5 X ... hey wait, that's a full inch taller! Not only that, but Stars, the anthology, runs larger than Meisha Merlin books but not as tall as Duainfey ... and Amazon's ruler-crew says it is ...9.2 x 6.4 x 1.6 inches ....
And you know what? It is NOT OUR FAULT (as authors )that book sizes are not standard. But really, how many hardcover sizes are there on your shelves, anyway? Are all Baen books the same size? Does Baen use this form factor to make their books stand tall?
no subject
2009-03-02 21:08 (UTC)no subject
2009-03-02 21:16 (UTC)(no subject)
by(no subject)
by(no subject)
by(no subject)
by(no subject)
by(no subject)
by(no subject)
byno subject
2009-03-02 21:23 (UTC)Lack of standardisation, certainly. Within publisher and printing era (i.e. until they change printers) there is usually some consistency, but not even always then. There are at least four different sizes of US hardbacks on my shelves[1], at least that many of trade paperbacks, and I can see at least five different paperback "mass market" sizes. That's not counting the UK publishers, who probably have that many again.
The wonderful thing about standards is...
... that there are so many to choose from...
[1] I don't have a big sample of any one hardback publisher, except my Tolkien set from Allen and Unwin (all printed around the same time and with a consistent cover style, so they don't count), but it seems to me from my much larger paperback collection that large publishers do tend to stick with the same printer for long periods and so the books within that time are fairly consistent. And some evidently use the same printers as other publishers. But "small presses" can vary a lot, and seem more likely to switch printers.
no subject
2009-03-02 21:32 (UTC)Trade paper appears to come in 8.5 and 9.0 inch tall, variously from any publisher. With the hard cover binding, these would correspond to 9.0 and 9.5 inch hardcovers.
All my bookcases are custom, and all the hardcover shelves are designed to accomodate the 9.5" hardcovers, as that is a common form factor.
I measure all my hardcovers . . .
2009-03-02 22:15 (UTC)Other publishers I often buy are either 9 1/4" or 8 1/2". I stock those 3 sizes, as well as 8" to fudge smaller stuff and 10" & 12" to fudge larger stuff. The occasional 8 3/4' turns up too.
And, no, I'm not a librarian.
no subject
2009-03-02 22:34 (UTC)But when are you going to issue the collector's editions?
2009-03-02 23:54 (UTC)Note: copies must be reserved in advance, as each and every one of these volumes is personally hand-engraved by a horde of dedicated fans, and if you've ever tried to get fans to do something, you'll know that it takes us a while to get them all in the same room, let alone working together.
e-books
2009-03-03 00:28 (UTC)Re: e-books
byno subject
2009-03-03 00:29 (UTC)no subject
2009-03-03 01:06 (UTC)no subject
2009-03-03 01:50 (UTC)Because if there were, all books in the library would line up on all the shelves as neat as you please, and we would not have to adjust shelves for everything from paperback mass market to quarto...
I seem to recall one angry shelver proclaiming that libraries should buy all books of only one size and refuse to buy anything not in that size until all publishers were forced to print all books the same size.
Yes, we who were more experienced traded looks over his tirade and agreed that he was clearly socially retarded...and had unrealistic expectations and was apparently something of a control freak.
Fortunately, he no longer works within our hallowed stacks. ;-)
BTW, I glommed onto a paperback copy of Duainfey at my local B&N just this past weekend.
Yummy reading...
Laura J. Underwood
No taller than some Del Rey and Ace hardbacks
2009-03-03 03:45 (UTC)They are markedly taller than some Bantam Spectra hardbacks from eight to twelve years ago, but shorter than some other hardbacks from SFBC.
And don't ask me about non-fiction popular hardbacks - at least two inches of variance, not counting coffee-table books or pocket books of various flavors.
no subject
2009-03-03 04:13 (UTC)I know not of these "standard sizes" of which you speak....
Hardcover sizes
2009-03-03 09:27 (UTC)e-books
2009-03-03 14:17 (UTC)Sorry.
Hardcover's are all odd...
2009-03-03 14:46 (UTC)The one real oddity about Baen hardcovers is that at some point in the 90's, they started using the same typeface/layout for hardcovers and paperbacks (the HH novels? I'm not sure). But I don't know if they continued that approach - I don't think so, since the "OMG this is UGLY" feeling hasn't leapt out at me with my more recent HC purchases.
Re: Hardcover's are all odd...
by