So, you hard-core hardback book readers ...
Can you tell me if *all* Baen hardcovers are the same width and height? If so is this a size you see in hardbacks from Tor or Daw or .... anyone else?
Odd question, you say? Well, gee, but see, the newest thing we, as authors, have been accused of is of being responsible for the fact that Duainfey ... and I assume Longeye as well, will not fit in a custom bookcase designed to house Lee & Miller books from Meisha Merlin.
And you know, just as we can't order a publisher to publish a book only in trade paper (of a certain size), or only in mass market, or first in hardback and then in three ring binders; we don't control the form factor of the style of book a publisher goes for.
Right -- see Duainfey is (according to Amazon, who/which may know) 9 x 5.9 x 1.2 inches ... while a sample from the Meisha Merlin years, say Balance of Trade, they tell us is 8.5 x 5.6 x 1.3 inches. No, wait, the advertent reader may want to get a ruler out -- because my copy of Duainfey seems to measure 9.5 X 6.5 X ... hey wait, that's a full inch taller! Not only that, but Stars, the anthology, runs larger than Meisha Merlin books but not as tall as Duainfey ... and Amazon's ruler-crew says it is ...9.2 x 6.4 x 1.6 inches ....
And you know what? It is NOT OUR FAULT (as authors )that book sizes are not standard. But really, how many hardcover sizes are there on your shelves, anyway? Are all Baen books the same size? Does Baen use this form factor to make their books stand tall?
Can you tell me if *all* Baen hardcovers are the same width and height? If so is this a size you see in hardbacks from Tor or Daw or .... anyone else?
Odd question, you say? Well, gee, but see, the newest thing we, as authors, have been accused of is of being responsible for the fact that Duainfey ... and I assume Longeye as well, will not fit in a custom bookcase designed to house Lee & Miller books from Meisha Merlin.
And you know, just as we can't order a publisher to publish a book only in trade paper (of a certain size), or only in mass market, or first in hardback and then in three ring binders; we don't control the form factor of the style of book a publisher goes for.
Right -- see Duainfey is (according to Amazon, who/which may know) 9 x 5.9 x 1.2 inches ... while a sample from the Meisha Merlin years, say Balance of Trade, they tell us is 8.5 x 5.6 x 1.3 inches. No, wait, the advertent reader may want to get a ruler out -- because my copy of Duainfey seems to measure 9.5 X 6.5 X ... hey wait, that's a full inch taller! Not only that, but Stars, the anthology, runs larger than Meisha Merlin books but not as tall as Duainfey ... and Amazon's ruler-crew says it is ...9.2 x 6.4 x 1.6 inches ....
And you know what? It is NOT OUR FAULT (as authors )that book sizes are not standard. But really, how many hardcover sizes are there on your shelves, anyway? Are all Baen books the same size? Does Baen use this form factor to make their books stand tall?
no subject
2009-03-02 21:08 (UTC)no subject
2009-03-02 21:16 (UTC)no subject
2009-03-02 21:23 (UTC)Lack of standardisation, certainly. Within publisher and printing era (i.e. until they change printers) there is usually some consistency, but not even always then. There are at least four different sizes of US hardbacks on my shelves[1], at least that many of trade paperbacks, and I can see at least five different paperback "mass market" sizes. That's not counting the UK publishers, who probably have that many again.
The wonderful thing about standards is...
... that there are so many to choose from...
[1] I don't have a big sample of any one hardback publisher, except my Tolkien set from Allen and Unwin (all printed around the same time and with a consistent cover style, so they don't count), but it seems to me from my much larger paperback collection that large publishers do tend to stick with the same printer for long periods and so the books within that time are fairly consistent. And some evidently use the same printers as other publishers. But "small presses" can vary a lot, and seem more likely to switch printers.
no subject
2009-03-02 21:27 (UTC)MRAS filing systems (Multiple Random Access Stacks) also have the advantage that the most recently accessed are usually near the top, so are faster to locate. Of course extracting something from lower down can cause a system crash and a re-hashing of the indexing order...
no subject
2009-03-02 21:32 (UTC)Trade paper appears to come in 8.5 and 9.0 inch tall, variously from any publisher. With the hard cover binding, these would correspond to 9.0 and 9.5 inch hardcovers.
All my bookcases are custom, and all the hardcover shelves are designed to accomodate the 9.5" hardcovers, as that is a common form factor.
no subject
2009-03-02 22:13 (UTC)I measure all my hardcovers . . .
2009-03-02 22:15 (UTC)Other publishers I often buy are either 9 1/4" or 8 1/2". I stock those 3 sizes, as well as 8" to fudge smaller stuff and 10" & 12" to fudge larger stuff. The occasional 8 3/4' turns up too.
And, no, I'm not a librarian.
no subject
2009-03-02 22:30 (UTC)So I still didn't have shelf storage.
no subject
2009-03-02 22:34 (UTC)no subject
2009-03-02 23:36 (UTC)But when are you going to issue the collector's editions?
2009-03-02 23:54 (UTC)Note: copies must be reserved in advance, as each and every one of these volumes is personally hand-engraved by a horde of dedicated fans, and if you've ever tried to get fans to do something, you'll know that it takes us a while to get them all in the same room, let alone working together.
e-books
2009-03-03 00:28 (UTC)no subject
2009-03-03 00:29 (UTC)no subject
2009-03-03 00:37 (UTC)Re: e-books
2009-03-03 00:45 (UTC)http://www.webscription.net/s-117-sharon-lee.aspx
no subject
2009-03-03 01:06 (UTC)no subject
2009-03-03 01:50 (UTC)Because if there were, all books in the library would line up on all the shelves as neat as you please, and we would not have to adjust shelves for everything from paperback mass market to quarto...
I seem to recall one angry shelver proclaiming that libraries should buy all books of only one size and refuse to buy anything not in that size until all publishers were forced to print all books the same size.
Yes, we who were more experienced traded looks over his tirade and agreed that he was clearly socially retarded...and had unrealistic expectations and was apparently something of a control freak.
Fortunately, he no longer works within our hallowed stacks. ;-)
BTW, I glommed onto a paperback copy of Duainfey at my local B&N just this past weekend.
Yummy reading...
Laura J. Underwood
No taller than some Del Rey and Ace hardbacks
2009-03-03 03:45 (UTC)They are markedly taller than some Bantam Spectra hardbacks from eight to twelve years ago, but shorter than some other hardbacks from SFBC.
And don't ask me about non-fiction popular hardbacks - at least two inches of variance, not counting coffee-table books or pocket books of various flavors.
no subject
2009-03-03 04:13 (UTC)I know not of these "standard sizes" of which you speak....
no subject
2009-03-03 09:01 (UTC)[1] Well, one of them. The other one is inconveniently placed overhead and things placed on it fall off. I need an working antigravity system to be able to use the ceiling as storage instead of wasting all that space up there...
Hardcover sizes
2009-03-03 09:27 (UTC)e-books
2009-03-03 14:17 (UTC)Sorry.
Hardcover's are all odd...
2009-03-03 14:46 (UTC)The one real oddity about Baen hardcovers is that at some point in the 90's, they started using the same typeface/layout for hardcovers and paperbacks (the HH novels? I'm not sure). But I don't know if they continued that approach - I don't think so, since the "OMG this is UGLY" feeling hasn't leapt out at me with my more recent HC purchases.
no subject
2009-03-06 02:55 (UTC)Step 0: Make sure the bulding you are modifying is structurally capable of supporting the weight of books that it will. Messing up this step might kill people, or worse, damage your book collection. :)
Step 1: Remove old ceiling. You need to do this to get access to the support members that hold up the floor above or the roof. Make sure that you haven't messed up step 0, and made some assumptions that will get you killed. It would be better to get an engineer competent in this area to do so if you are not one yourself.
Step 2: Attach mounting brackets to support members. These will hold up your replacement ceiling and whatever in the way of netting and straps that attach directly.
Step 3: Put in replacement ceiling. Most regular ceilings ceiling will not support the weight of many books, and would be damaged if books are forced into them. I am thinking this should be a metal grate.
Step 4: Attach whatever straps and netting that are needed to hold up the books. These should be anchored to the new ceiling or the original supports. (Attaching to the original supports is why I am thinking grate.)
Step 5: Load with books.
Step 6: Try not to die.
Re: Hardcover's are all odd...
2009-03-15 14:08 (UTC)Tor has used different sizes of hardcover, including in the same series I seem to remember.
And then there is the taller paperback form that some publishers use for bestselling authors.... I used to hate trade paperbacks for having the bulk and mass and most of the expense of a hardcover (though it seems to be that the prices of them have gone up as a slower rate than hardcovers over the years) combined with the durability of a mass market paperback, which with the larger size and mass means much greater susceptibility to and faster deterioration and damage than to a mass market paperback, but the taller mass market paperback has replaced trade paperback as most detested format-- I have small hands, and the increase in the width of the book, even though it is slight, combined with the height increase, means that they are extremely uncomfortable for me to hold--the distance is too far for my hands from open edge of book to the spine to hold without discomfot/the open edge of the covers cutting into my hands, and my fingers can barely reach the spine hold, AND there is a "torque" factor due to the longer length of the book and not having large hands, it's one of the type of effects of the flopping ends of a teeter totter, trying from the MIDDLE to avoid flopping... doesn't work, there's a lot more effort and physical discomfort with the moments of inertia involved a longer length and trying to balance at that center...